Comparison between Russian and German Revolutions Essay

Comparison between Russian and German Revolutions - Essay Example However, both of the events lasted for very few years only and ended in fiasco eventually without achieving the targets and goals on the foundations of which the revolts had been raised by the revolutionaries. The following lines aim to discuss the chronicle of incidents leading towards the revolution along with the aftermath of these great events of the world history. The Paper Russian Revolution: Aptly stated as the Bolshevik or October Revolution 1917, the Russian revolution was actually the outcome of the prevailing despotism, nepotism, poverty, social inequality and suppression of the haves-not at the hands of the haves in the early twentieth century Russia. Consequently, the revolution was entirely socialistic in nature that took place on the Marxist-Leninist principles of justice, freedom and equality. Hence, the revolution had essentially been planned and structured against the prevailing socioeconomic discrimination, injustices and inequalities under the imperialist Russian political structure. The despotism, according to the revolutionaries, had patronized the malpractices and exploitation of the deprived strata by the cruel elite stratum. Although the entire Europe had witnessed the same social scheme under despotic rulers, yet the improvements could be witnessed in the western and central parts of the continent after the advent of famous 18th century French Revolution. However, being a separate and farther zone of Europe, Russia could not witness any uplift in the socioeconomic lot of the masses, and her situation was almost similar to that of 18th century France. Consequently, poverty, slavery, serfdom and class discrimination existed in Russia at their full swing even after one and half century of the advent of Industrial Revolution of 1750. The Russian subjects were bound to lead the life of misery, deprivation and lawlessness under Czarsi, where the oily-tongued flatterer courtiers and opportunists like Rasputin and others could have access thro ugh unfair means and nasty activities. â€Å"Under pressure from richer Europe the Russian State swallowed up a far greater relative part of the people’s wealth than in the West, and thereby not only condemned the people to a twofold poverty, but also weakened the foundations of the possessing classes.† (Trotsky 1930, 3) 1 Marxist perspective also played an important part in accelerating the pace of revolution in Russia. Karl Marx (1817-1883) had presented his social conflict theory during the later part of nineteenth century, through which he had communicated to the downtrodden members of society the message of organized struggle for obtaining their rights on the foundations of the hard efforts they made while working in the agricultural fields as well as in industrial zones from dawn to dusk, against which they attainted almost nothing. Marx was of the opinion that the workers, laborers and peasants consumed considerable period of time and energies, but the industria lists and feudal enjoyed lion’s share in the profit of the product. Hence, there was urgent need of the revising of contract between the owners and workers in order to avoid bloody conflict between the two. If the contract freely entered into by the vendors of money in the form of wages and the vendors of their own labor that is, between the employer and the workers were concluded not for a definite and limited term only, but for one’