Analysis of Barthes Toys Essay Example

Analysis of Barthes Toys Paper In his essay, â€Å"Toys†, Roland Barthes is trying to inform the reader about the influence of French toys on children and how those toys have lost their creative side as more toys were produced to mimic the adult life. All the traits that French people acquire are created by the society and those particular traits are socialized into the toy that is being produced. Barthes states in his essay that The fact that French toys literally prefigure the world of adult functions obviously cannot but prepare the child to accept them all, by constructing for him, even before he can think about it (35). By handing a toy to a child, parents send them a message and that message is to accept this toy and let it shape their life since they can’t use their imaginations to create something else. Barthes succeeds in his writing because he gives examples of toys that prefigure the adult world in France and toys that used to spark creativity in kids before so he does succeed in explaining the influence of French toys on children. A toy that supports Barthes’ conclusions about French toys is a small kitchen set which is created to prove to the girls that their role in the society is to cook in the house and be a stay at home mom or wife. An American toy that provides a counter-example to Barthes’ conclusions could be a teddy bear since this plush toy does not mimic the adult world in any manner nor does it prepare a child for rules in society. We will write a custom essay sample on Analysis of Barthes Toys specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Analysis of Barthes Toys specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Analysis of Barthes Toys specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Ronald Barthes is not fair in his conclusions due to the fact that he is generalizing that all French people provide toys in order to prepare their children for future roles in society. Barthes generalizes by saying that â€Å"all the toys one commonly sees are essentially a microcosm of the adult world† (34). Barthes classifies all toys into the same category which are toys that imitate the adult world but I’m sure that there are French children who get toys that let them express their creativity. Not all toys are made to mimic the adult world so Barthes is being unfair in his conclusions. Barthes’ conclusions don’t hold true in the United States for the simple fact that all the toys that are sold here don’t mimic the adult world. Toys such as building bricks or coloring books leave most of the imagination to children so they are not meant to make the kids act like adults who take on specific roles in the society. United States does have toys that represent different roles in the society but those are not the only toys that are being sold here and that’s why Barthes’ conclusions do not hold true in the United States.

Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas essays

Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas essays On May 17, 1954 the Supreme Court had made its decision on the Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas case. The Supreme Court declared unanimously separate facilities are inherently unequal. If facilities are separate they are essentially not the same. This point is shown in a recent case, which shows similar concern over equal opportunity as that rose in Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. The Supreme Court case of United States vs. Virginia illustrated discrimination against women. It started when a young African American student in Topeka, Linda Brown, requested to attend a local all-white school in her neighborhood rather then an all-black school that was further away. The case began in 1951 when Oliver Brown, her father, sued the Topeka, Kansas Board of Education. He was suing to allow his 8-year-old daughter Linda to attend a school that only white children were allowed to attend. After numerous appeals, the case reached the Supreme Court. There a lawyer named Thurgood Marshall argued on behalf of Brown and against segregation in Americas schools. The landmark Plessy vs. Ferguson verdict of 1896 had held that separate but equal public facilities for white and blacks were legal. Schools were public conveniences, and Brown, therefore, was rejected. Afterward the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) became a part of the case and appealed it all the way to the Supreme Court. It was then, on May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court had made its most significant ruling. By overturning Plessy vs. Ferguson, the certain Supreme Court declared that in the area of public schooling the doctrine of separate but equal had no place. The case ruled that segregation was unconstitutional because it violated the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court ordered that school integration go forward with all deliberate speed. The case took apart...